Bob leaves a comment under the editorial (reprinted below) in The Jewish Daily Forward)
============
If my Jewish-American identity continues to get handcuffed to that whack warhawk loop Lieberman, I'm going to give Quaker Meeting another try. The last time I gave it a whirl, half the last names at Meeting were Jewish.
I wonder why. What must an American Jew who dreams of peace and respectful co-existence -- here and in the Middle East -- do? Two-fisted Muslim-bombing Liebermanism seems to be the predominate culture at the synagogue.
I'm an American Jew and a Vietnam-era Army vet. (Law School Joe is NOT a military vet, he never served, risked or sacrificed. He plays Holy War Poker with other peoples' chips.)
Liebermanism is the path to more war and more dead soldiers -- ours and eventually Israelis. The belief that Lieberman is protecting America or protecting Israel is a hallucination, a militaristic illusion.
And Lieberman's public Vaudeville holiness act plays directly into the creepy End Times fantasies of the far-right fundamentalist Christians who brought us 8 years of Bush and plunged America and my neighbors' kids in uniform into the tar-baby nightmare of Iraq. Next stop on the McCain-Lieberman bus: Bombing Iran, instantly followed by ground war.
The Apocalypse is NOT how I want to partner cozily with my Christian neighbors.
Let me be an American Jew who supports Israel and its long-term security WITHOUT being forced to wear the militaristic warhawk Lieberman t-shirt.
It's not about antisemitism. It's about the dead soldier kids, dummy. And once they're dead, who cares anymore if they were Jews or Muslims or Christians?
Dead young soldiers are forever beyond political and religious controversy. Give me an American Jewish political leader who's not violent and insane.
============
The Jewish Daily Forward (USA daily)
Friday 21 December 2007
Editorial:
Joe-Bashing and the Jews
Antisemitism on the Internet is nothing new. Neither are liberal attacks on Senator Joseph Lieberman, the hawkish former Democrat from Connecticut. It’s tempting, therefore, to pooh-pooh as same-old-same-old the odious Jew-bashing that popped up amid the mass Joe-bashing flooding the Web this week in the wake of Lieberman’s endorsement of Republican John McCain for president.
It’s tempting, but wrong. This isn’t the familiar fringe bigotry that we’re accustomed to tut-tutting and then ignoring. This is something newer and more alarming.
It is true that antisemitic conspiracy-mongering has been a feature of the Internet since the Web’s inception, both in fringe chat rooms and in individual postings to mainstream news sites. What is new in this week’s fireworks is the seeming normality, even respectability, of anti-Jewish conspiracy theories.
In other times, charges of Israeli plotting, Jewish disloyalty and Zionist control of Washington crept lamely into public discourse, only to be ignored or ridiculed by the mainstream. This week, claims of Jewish treachery were a mainstream thread in nearly every online discussion of the Lieberman-McCain brouhaha.
The claims appeared repeatedly, insistently, in the talkback sections of the most respectable news and opinion Web sites, from The Huffington Post and Think Progress to CNN, The Atlantic and AOL News. Saner discussants challenged them, for the most part, not contemptuously but respectfully, as though these were unremarkable, unobjectionable views.
The Jew-bashers answered their critics not by slinking away but by defending themselves confidently and even throwing back the challenge. Other participants sprang to their defense. They behaved and were received, it seemed, not as solitary crackpots but as a serious faction in the general debate.
This public festival of Jew-bashing is not a sudden or isolated phenomenon but part of a larger shift in the culture. As we have argued before, accusations of Jewish political dominance have been steadily gaining visibility and respectability since the run-up to the Iraq War five years ago. It’s now commonplace in some arenas, including academia, journalism and political activism, though not yet in electoral politics, to accuse Israel and its advocates of subverting American policy, bullying their critics and suppressing open discussion of the issues.
Those last accusations — bullying and stifling criticism — are crucial to the overall effectiveness of the onslaught. And it is an onslaught, a skirmish in the continuing Arab-Israeli conflict, in which unthinking friends of the Middle East combatants are pitted against each other in an American war of words and influence.
Ironically, when Israel’s foes successfully present themselves as underdogs and victims of Jewish bullying, the very attempt by Jews to fight back becomes evidence for the prosecution. And the more the Jewish community’s advocates try to respond with their old, familiar weapons of self-defense — the historic claims of victimhood and vulnerability — the less effective the weapons become.
American Jews have long presented themselves as fighting allies of the embattled Jewish state. Now the other side is firing back, using the Jewish community’s own weapons. American Jews are caught off guard, unprepared for the counterattack.
If events continue on their current course, it’s not hard to imagine Jews in America finding themselves one day facing the same dilemma that confronted Jews 80 years ago: suspect in their neighbors’ eyes as an alien, threatening force, yet ironically helpless to defend themselves.
They are not there yet, by any yardstick, and they may never get there. American Jews still have vast resources. They have many more friends than enemies. But a critical milestone has been passed: The post-Holocaust taboo on demonization of Jews is very nearly gone.
Comfortable Jewish communities in Europe and elsewhere find themselves on the defensive in the face of Israel’s increasing unpopularity. America is not an island. Things here could stop where they are, or they could continue downhill.
It doesn’t help when the biggest Jewish representative bodies allow themselves and their community to be identified in the public eye with a discredited administration and a larger conservative movement in terminal meltdown. It doesn’t help when Jews ignore or deny Israel’s genuine shortcomings. It doesn’t help when they overreact to criticism — hostile, benign or just clumsy — and intimidate their critics into resentful silence, reinforcing their enemies’ worst stereotypes.
The Jewish community and its advocacy organizations could sit still and hope for the best, or they could act deliberately to alter the course of events. But if they wish to change the flow of events, they must find new strategies. The current ones aren’t working.
- 30 -
1 comment:
"It's not about antisemitism. It's about the dead soldier kids, dummy. And once they're dead, who cares anymore if they were Jews or Muslims or Christians?"
Ah, but that's precisely the point. It matters who you were in this world because, according to each of our monotheistic traditions, only certain of us get to be in G-d's company after we are dead to this world. That is the foundational source of all this conflict; who gets the divine attention in the next world.
Of course, the liberal religious voice is to say that we all do...it is beyond our imagining. But Fundamentalists in any of our three traditions are not willing or able to admit that Jews, Christians and Muslims might just manage to somehow co-exist in the next life.
Post a Comment